Trump files $15 billion lawsuit against New York Times over campaign coverage

 


Former U.S. President Donald Trump has filed a sweeping $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, four of its reporters, and Penguin Random House, claiming they deliberately damaged his reputation and tried to derail his 2024 presidential campaign. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, accuses the newspaper of spreading “false and defamatory” content about his business record and character in an effort to prejudice judges, juries and voters. The reporters named in the lawsuit are Susanne Craig, Russ Buettner, Peter Baker and Michael S. Schmidt, with Penguin Random House targeted for publishing Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success, a book critical of Trump written by Craig and Buettner.

According to the filing, The New York Times published long-form articles and an editorial endorsing Democratic opponent Kamala Harris that Trump’s lawyers say portrayed him as a threat to democracy and a would-be dictator. The lawsuit calls the Times “a full-throated mouthpiece for the Democrat Party” and accuses it of running “industrial-scale defamation” to undermine political opponents. Trump argues the reporting misrepresented his achievements and ignored what he describes as “the greatest personal and political achievement in American history” with his 2024 election win.

Letters attached to the lawsuit show that Trump’s legal team demanded the Times and Penguin Random House stop making what they called “false and defamatory statements.” Both media organizations rejected those demands. David McCraw, a lawyer for the Times, defended its coverage, writing that the complaint was built on “falsehoods” and a “deeply troubling notion that anyone who dares to report unfavorable facts about a presidential candidate is engaged in sabotage.” Carolyn K. Foley, senior vice president and associate general counsel at Penguin Random House, responded that disagreeing with Trump’s self-assessment does not amount to defamation.

The lawsuit seeks no less than $15 billion in compensatory damages and additional punitive damages, making it one of the largest media defamation claims in U.S. history. Legal experts note that defamation cases brought by public figures face a high bar under the “actual malice” standard, which requires proving that journalists knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The case underscores Trump’s long-running battle with mainstream media outlets and his willingness to take on major news organizations as he seeks to frame himself as a victim of biased coverage heading into the next election cycle.

 

Comments