The Trump administration has announced a major shift in
federal education funding, moving nearly $500 million toward
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Tribal Colleges and
Universities (TCUs). This one-time increase — a 48% boost for HBCUs and
more than a doubling of funds for TCUs — is being covered primarily by cuts to
other minority-serving programs.
According to the Education Department, about $350 million
has been cut from grants that were reserved for colleges enrolling large
numbers of Hispanic students. Officials argue these programs were
unconstitutional because eligibility was tied to specific minority enrollment
thresholds rather than overall student need or merit.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the changes shift
money away from “ineffective and discriminatory programs” and toward
initiatives “that support student success.” The department is also channeling $60
million into charter schools and $137 million into American history
and civics programs, following an executive action signed by President Trump
earlier this year.
Supporters of the move point to Trump’s longstanding efforts
to present himself as a champion of HBCUs, noting previous increases in federal
support and new White House initiatives. Critics, including Democratic
lawmakers, warn the cuts reverse decades of bipartisan policy designed to close
equity gaps for Latino and other underrepresented students in higher education.
The changes come as the Justice Department declines to
defend the Hispanic-Serving Institution grant program in court, citing
constitutional concerns raised by Tennessee and Students for Fair Admissions,
an anti-affirmative-action group. The lawsuit argues that schools missing the
“arbitrary” 25% Hispanic enrollment threshold are unfairly excluded from tens
of millions of dollars in aid.
In short, the Trump administration is using its expanded
spending authority to reorient federal education dollars toward HBCUs, tribal
colleges, charter schools, and civics programs — a dramatic reshuffling that
could reshape how minority-serving institutions are funded in the future.
Comments
Post a Comment